Affirmative Action

This case delves into the recent civil rights investigation initiated by the United States Department of Education into Harvard University’s legacy admissions policy.

Following the Supreme Court’s decision to curtail the use of affirmative action in higher education, concerns have arisen about potential discrimination based on wealth, and privilege. Legacy preferences, which provide an advantage to applicants with family ties to the institution, have been a long-standing practice in selective college admissions.

However, recent criticism against this practice has intensified, particularly following the Supreme Court’s decision to dismantle the use of race-based affirmative action in admissions.

Context

Non-conflictual

Belonging

Persistent

Outcome

Modus vivendi

Stephen Sawyer
Stephen Sawyer

PI of WP2 and responsible for France data collection

Zona Zarić
Zona Zarić

Postdoctoral Fellow and WP2 co-lead

Learn more about this topic

Freedom of Expression in an Era of Extremism

This case-study explores a good and a bad example of balances being struck around freedom of expression and the protection of minorities or national ...

Toleration vs. Compassion

This case examines the Australian referendum on indigenous rights, specifically focusing on the establishment of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. The conceptual ...

Same-Sex Partnerships and the Case of Civil Union Law in Cyprus

This case analyzes the regulatory rights prism surrounding the Civil Union Law (CUL), shedding light on its impact on LGBTQI+ rights and the broader ...

Secular and Islamic Feminisms in Morocco

Secular and Islamic feminisms and their struggle for gender equality in Morocco is selected as a case as it illustrates how a top-down legal ...

Read the whole case

Our Regulatory Rights Toolkit for Attuning Everyday Extremism is available free of charge and will allow you to delve deeper into the topics of your interest.