This case examines the emergence of neurorights in the context of the growing influence of neurotechnologies. Initially fueled by optimism, recent trends have given way to increased concerns, leading to the proposal and debate around the concept of neurorights.
The case explores the evolving landscape of neurotechnologies and the consequent push for neurorights, which has generated substantial debate. The choice of Chile as a case study is driven by its groundbreaking constitutional amendment, making it the first country to legislate on neurorights.
The methods employed in these initiatives and the rationale behind their choice shed light on their role in shaping the global discourse on neurorights. The case elucidates the diverse actors influencing the trajectory of neurotechnologies, including international organizations, professional associations, and governmental agencies.
The nuances of proposed neurorights regulations are explored, reflecting the ongoing discourse on the appropriateness of distinct legal frameworks for the cognitive domain.
