Headscarf Controversy in Turkey

The headscarf controversy in Turkey shows how different regulatory-rights frameworks on the same issue across time create different pathways leading to different outcomes.

The context was exclusionary until AKP’s coming to power in 2002, which generated a resentful mode of belonging among the veiled women. JDP’s coming to power, especially in its early years, gave hope that there might finally emerge an emancipatory context, with heightened sense of belonging and a transformative outcome. However, attunement remained partial.

The precarity which came with continued distrust and fear prevented transformation of the Turkish context for the veiled women. An outcome of dialogue emerged as the hard-line secularists recognized the consequences of exclusion and discrimination which enabled Islamization policies with public support and activist Islamist women increasingly recognize that the controversy goes beyond headscarf.

The headscarf controversy case illustrates that regulatory-right pathways need a wider understanding that any religious conflict also has gender and social class dimensions. As long as it is reduced to a lifestyle choice, it is not possible to create a democratic and emancipatory regulatory-rights pathway that might end up in an emancipatory context where discriminated groups have heightened sense of belonging due to comprehensive attunement, inclusivity and social justice. Only then, the outcome can be transformative.

Context

Exclusionary (1930s-2002) Uneasy (post-2002)

Belonging

Resentful / Persistent

Outcome

Dialogue

Hasret Dikici Bilgin
Hasret Dikici Bilgin

EDI Board and WP2 & WP7 Team Member. Responsible for Turkey Data collection & Attunement Implementation

Learn more about this topic

Fallacies in the Concept of Gender in Iraq

After 2003, Iraq made significant strides towards integrating human rights into its national framework, spurred by its interim and subsequent 2005 permanent constitution which ...

The Dialectic of Women’s Political Participation in Iraq in the Face of Hate Speech Leading to Violence

Following the 2003 transition to democracy, Iraq has actively pursued the enhancement of women’s rights and political participation. This effort was influenced by both ...

Freedom of Expression in an Era of Extremism

This case-study explores a good and a bad example of balances being struck around freedom of expression and the protection of minorities or national ...

Toleration vs. Compassion

This case examines the Australian referendum on indigenous rights, specifically focusing on the establishment of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. The conceptual ...

Read the whole case

Our Regulatory Rights Toolkit for Attuning Everyday Extremism is available free of charge and will allow you to delve deeper into the topics of your interest.